Requirements play a critical role in a design conversation of systems and products. Product and system design exists at the crossroads of problems, solutions and requirements. Requirements contextualize problems and solutions, pointing the way to feasible outcomes. These are captured with models and detailed specifications. Still, stakeholders need to be able to understand one-another using shared design representations in order to mobilize bias and transform knowledge towards legitimized, desired results. Many modern modeling languages, including UML, as well as detailed, logic-based specifications are beyond the comprehension of key stakeholders. Hence, they inhibit, rather than promote design conversation. Improved design boundary objects (DBO), especially design requirements boundary objects (DRBO), need to be created and refined to improve the communications between principals. Four key features of design boundary objects that improve and promote design conversation are discussed in detail. A systems analysis and design case study is presented which demonstrates these features in action. It describes how a small team of analysts worked with key stakeholders to mobilize and guide a complex system design discussion towards an unexpected, yet desired outcome within a short time frame. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009.
CITATION STYLE
Bergman, M. (2009). Requirements’ role in mobilizing and enabling design conversation. In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (Vol. 14 LNBIP, pp. 394–407). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92966-6_22
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.