A tale of two classifiers: SNoW vs. SVM in visual recognition

9Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Numerous statistical learning methods have been developed for visual recognition tasks. Few attempts, however, have been made to address theoretical issues, and in particular, study the suitability of different learning algorithms for visual recognition. Large margin classifiers, such as SNoW and SVM, have recently demonstrated their success in object detection and recognition. In this paper, we present a theoretical account of these two learning approaches, and their suitability to visual recognition. Using tools from computational learning theory, we show that the main difference between the generalization bounds of SVM and SNoW depends on the properties of the data. We argue that learning problems in the visual domain have sparseness characteristics and exhibit them by analyzing data taken from face detection experiments. Experimental results exhibit good generalization and robustness properties of the SNoW-based method, and conform to the theoretical analysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, M. H., Roth, D., & Ahuja, N. (2002). A tale of two classifiers: SNoW vs. SVM in visual recognition. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 2353, pp. 685–699). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47979-1_46

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free