Validation d'un questionnaire mesurant l'adhérence et les compétences de gestion des effets secondaires chez des patients traités par capécitabine

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction There is a plea for the development of tools allowing the screening of fragile patients under oral chemotherapy. Such tools would identify patients with difficulties for being adherent or for having low side effects management skills. The aim of this study is to validate psychometric characteristics of a questionnaire assessing patients' adherence and skill level of management for oral capecitabine treatment. Methods Questionnaire's psychometric validation study. Prospective monocentric cohort. Cases-simulated questionnaire was constructed, according to recommendations, from the results of a socio-anthropological study. Validation phases included: a pre-testing and a field-testing including acceptability, scale reliability and internal consistency were conducted involving experts and patients sample. Results Pre-testing excluded 1 item. Acceptability phase included 15 patients, who did not change any of the questions. Reliability and internal consistency were tested with 67 patients. Cancer site did not statistically influence questionnaire answers. No correlation was identify with the analyse performed for the internal consistency testing. Conclusion This questionnaire has shown to be a valid tool for the assessment of the adherence and side effect management skill for patients with capecitabine treatment. It can easily be uses as a screening tool for prescribers. It can also be used as an evaluation tool for a therapeutic education programme in this field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baudot, A., Oriol, M., Tinquaut, F., Moine, V., Moriceau, G., Muron, T., … Bourmaud, A. (2016). Validation d’un questionnaire mesurant l’adhérence et les compétences de gestion des effets secondaires chez des patients traités par capécitabine. Bulletin Du Cancer, 103(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2016.01.010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free