Emergence of Extracellular Vesicles as “Liquid Biopsy” for Neurological Disorders: Boom or Bust

25Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as an attractive liquid biopsy approach in the diagnosis and prognosis of multiple diseases and disorders. The feasibility of enriching specific subpopulations of EVs from biofluids based on their unique surface markers has opened novel opportunities to gain molecular insight from various tissues and organs, including the brain. Over the past decade, EVs in bodily fluids have been ex-tensively studied for biomarkers associated with various neurological disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease, Par-kinson’s disease, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorders, substance use disorders, human immunodeficiency virus–associated neurocognitive dis-order, and cancer/treatment-induced neurodegeneration. These studies have focused on the isolation and cargo characterization of either total EVs or brain cells, such as neuron-, astrocyte-, microglia-, oligodendrocyte-, pericyte-, and endothelial-derived EVs from biofluids to achieve early diagnosis and molecular characterization and to predict the treatment and intervention outcomes. The findings of these studies have demonstrated that EVs could serve as a repetitive and less invasive source of valuable molecular information for these neurological disorders, supplementing existing costly neuroimaging techniques and relatively invasive measures, like lumbar puncture. However, the initial excitement surrounding blood-based biomarkers for brain-related diseases has been tempered by challenges, such as lack of central nervous system specificity in EV markers, lengthy protocols, and the absence of standardized procedures for biological sample collection, EV isolation, and characterization. Nevertheless, with rapid advancements in the EV field, supported by improved isolation methods and sensitive assays for cargo characterization, brain cell–derived EVs continue to offer unparallel opportunities with signifi-cant translational implications for various neurological disorders. Significance Statement——Extracellular vesicles present a less invasive liquid biopsy approach in the diagnosis and prognosis of various neurological disorders. Characterizing these vesicles in biofluids holds the potential to yield valuable molecular information, thereby significantly impacting the development of novel bio-markers for various neurological disorders. This paper has reviewed the methodology employed to isolate extracellular vesicles derived from various brain cells in biofluids, their utility in enhancing the molecular understanding of neurodegeneration, and the potential challenges in this research field.

Figures

References Powered by Scopus

Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles

4905Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Overview of extracellular vesicles, their origin, composition, purpose, and methods for exosome isolation and analysis

2204Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures

2134Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis: An Effective Tool to Characterize Extracellular Vesicles

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Emerging Role of Extracellular Vesicles as Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Diseases and Their Clinical and Therapeutic Potential in Central Nervous System Pathologies

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Brain incoming call from glia during neuroinflammation: Roles of extracellular vesicles

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kumar, A., Nader, M. A., & Deep, G. (2024). Emergence of Extracellular Vesicles as “Liquid Biopsy” for Neurological Disorders: Boom or Bust. Pharmacological Reviews. American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapy (ASPET). https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.122.000788

Readers over time

‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

53%

Researcher 5

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

38%

Neuroscience 4

31%

Physics and Astronomy 2

15%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

15%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0