Underlining some mathematical and physical aspects about the concept of motion in general relativity

Abstract

The Einstein initial foundations of general relativity have to do with his great intuition and they are not clear as it is for special relativity. As has been widely emphasized, for example, in the book of Ohanian and Ruffini, the very name of the theory indicates a misconception. Despite this, the high school textbooks (at least the Italian ones) and books of scientific divulgation introduce the Einstein gravitational theory still following the initial approach leading, in our opinion, to misinterpretations. A careful student, for example, immediately asks: it is not true that the Earth rotates because I can consider it at rest thanks to general relativity theory. The relativity of motion is trivial in mathematics while it has deep meaning in physics and it is not sufficiently analyzed. Similarly, the arbitrary choice of the origin and the perfect equivalence between all coordinate systems are mathematical properties satisfied by general relativity and students can confuse it with physical equivalence between reference systems that have a deeper meaning and the Einstein theory does not verify it. Gravitational force does not exist and this is the real core of Einsteinian revolution. As happens in Newtonian physics and Special Relativity, also in general relativity the relative motions are the geodesic motions with the difference that spacetime can be curved and geodesics may not be a straight line. Similarly, in general relativity forces cause non-geodesic motion. Geodesic and non-geodesic are tensorial properties and for this reason they are absolute.