Comparison of A1C and fasting glucose criteria to diagnose diabetes among U.S. adults

156Citations
Citations of this article
123Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE - To compare A1C and fasting glucose for the diagnosis of diabetes among U.S. adults. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - This study included 6,890 adults (≥20 years of age) from the 1999-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey without a self-reported history of diabetes who had fasted ≥9 h. A1C ≥6.5% and fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dl were used, separately, to define diabetes. RESULTS- Overall, 1.8% of U.S. adults had A1C ≥6.5% and fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dl, 0.5% had A1C ≥6.5% and fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dl, and 1.8% had A1C ≥6.5% and fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dl. Compared with individuals with A1C ≥6.5% and fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dl, individuals with A1C ≥6.5% and fasting glucose <126 mg/dl were younger, more likely to be non-Hispanic black, had lower Hb levels, and had higher C-reactive protein. CONCLUSIONS - A1C ≥6.5% demonstrates reasonable agreement with fasting glucose for diagnosing diabetes among U.S. adults. © 2010 by the American Diabetes Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carson, A. P., Reynolds, K., Fonseca, V. A., & Muntner, P. (2010). Comparison of A1C and fasting glucose criteria to diagnose diabetes among U.S. adults. Diabetes Care, 33(1), 95–97. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1227

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free