The value of dp2 was incorrectly given in the main text. The correct value, for both the r2SCAN exchange and correlation energy functionals, is dp2 = 0.361 as given in the Supporting Information. We regret the error and thank F. Tran for bringing this to our attention. The authors were made aware at the time of publication of calculations using the TASK exchange functional that demonstrate increased numeric efficiency [Hofmann, F.; Kümmel, S. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 153, 114106; DOI: 10.1063/5.0023657]. We therefore regret our assertion that the modifications TASK proposes are not expected to increase numerical efficiency and instead refer interested readers to their work. We thank S. Kümmel for bringing this to our attention. Neither error affects the ensuing material in the original publication nor its conclusions.
CITATION STYLE
Furness, J. W., Kaplan, A. D., Ning, J., Perdew, J. P., & Sun, J. (2020, November 5). Erratum: Accurate and Numerically Efficient r2SCAN Meta-Generalized Gradient Approximation (Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters (2020) 11: 19 (8208−8215) DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02405). Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03077
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.