Possible sources of acoustic emission during static bending test of wood specimens

7Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The paper is dedicated to identification of sources of acoustic emission generated during static bending test of wood specimen. Information on wood structure, wood failure behavior and computer-generated finite element method (FEM) simulation of static bending test were used to localize and estimate power of individual acoustic emission sources. Significant acoustic emission sources are expected in the specimen in two areas: under the upper central support (during the entire bending test run) and in the tension portion of the specimen at the centre of lower baseline (at the fracture/destruction time). Strong acoustic emission sources were registered in tension portion of the specimen in direct connection with final fracture of specimen.

References Powered by Scopus

Handbook of wood chemistry and wood composites, second edition

1139Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A plane stress softening plasticity model for orthotropic materials

228Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Acoustics of wood

183Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Acoustic emission technique for fracture analysis in wood materials

49Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Acoustic monitoring of timber structures: Influence of wood species under bending loading

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Wooden beam damage evaluation under bending loading based on the integration of acoustic emission and principal component analysis

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Varner, D., Černý, M., Varner, M., & Fajman, M. (2012). Possible sources of acoustic emission during static bending test of wood specimens. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 60(3), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201260030199

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘17‘18‘19‘22‘2301234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

38%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

50%

Materials Science 3

38%

Social Sciences 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0