Cross-cultural adaptation of the Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire-Brazil in Parkinson’s disease

3Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Culturally adapted measures to assess the performance of activities of daily living (ADL) in individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD) are limited in Brazil. Objective: To adapt the ADL Questionnaire to the Brazilian culture and to analyze its reproducibility in individuals with PD. Methods: The ADL Questionnaire was translated and cross-culturally adapted to Brazilian Portuguese language. Reproducibility was analyzed using test-retest reliability and agreement values. The test-retest reliability of the individual items and total scores were calculated. The limits of agreement were verified using the Bland-Altman plot. The standard error of measurement (SEM) and the minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated. Patients who were classified on a score of 1–4 on the modified Hoehn and Yahr scale were eligible. Results: No divergence was identified between the original and the adapted version, which demonstrated adequate semantic and conceptual equivalence. The Bland-Altman plot showed no systematic changes in the mean test-retest scores. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.93–0.99), and all individual items showed good levels of reliability (>0.60). The SEM (SEM%) and MDC (MDC%) values were 3.0 (6.75%) and 8.2 (18.7%), respectively. These values are within the recommended values. Conclusions: The ADL-Brazil Questionnaire is a reliable instrument to be used for clinical and research purposes to assess self-perceptions of ADL performance in individuals with PD.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alves, W. L. T., de Faria-Fortini, I., Galvão, A. C. D. R., Cardoso, F. E. C., & Scalzo, P. L. (2021). Cross-cultural adaptation of the Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire-Brazil in Parkinson’s disease. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 79(12), 1101–1108. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2020-0396

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free