Economic analysis of integrated weed management in field bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in field bean in the north-eastern part of the Republic of Croatia to compare weed control and crop response under different management practices within the critical period of field bean production. The practices consisted in broadcast application of labelled rate of preemergence herbicide (PRE) and postemergence herbicide application: (POST) broadcast, band application over the rows, and band application combined with mechanical cultivation using of different herbicide doses recommended by the manufacturer (2x, 1x, 1/2x, 1/4x, 1/8x). In 1999, weed control with PRE application of pendimethalin was superior to POST bentazone application due to late emergence of weeds and lack of residual herbicide control. In 2000 bentazone combined with cycloxydim controlled weeds in field bean better than PRE herbicide application. Based on the results of this research, single PRE or POST application of herbicide did not control a broad spectrum of weeds and did not provide the commercially acceptable full season control. Reduced rates of herbicide are not advisable under high weed pressure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Štefanić, E., Štefanić, I., & Murdoch, A. J. (2003). Economic analysis of integrated weed management in field bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant, Soil and Environment, 49(4), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.17221/4111-pse

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free