Naturalizing Peirce's semiotics: Ecological psychology's solution to the problem of creative abduction

6Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The study of model-based reasoning (MBR) is one of the most interesting recent developments at the intersection of psychology and the philosophy of science. Although a broad and eclectic area of inquiry, one central axis by which MBR connects these disciplines is anchored at one end in theories of internal reasoning (in cognitive science), and at the other, in C.S. Peirce's semiotics (in philosophy). In this paper, we attempt to show that Peirce's semiotics actually has more natural affinity on the psychological side with ecological psychology, as originated by James J. Gibson and especially Egon Brunswik, than it does with non-interactionist approaches to cognitive science. In particular, we highlight the strong ties we believe to exist between the triarchic structure of semiotics as conceived by Peirce, and the similar triarchic stucture of Brunswik's lens model of organismic achievement in irreducibly uncertain ecologies. The lens model, considered as a theory of creative abduction, provides a concrete instantiation of at least one, albeit limited, interpretation of Peirce's semiotics, one that we believe could be quite fruitful in future theoretical and empirical investigations of MBR in both science and philosophy. © 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kirlik, A., & Storkerson, P. (2010). Naturalizing Peirce’s semiotics: Ecological psychology’s solution to the problem of creative abduction. In Studies in Computational Intelligence (Vol. 314, pp. 31–50). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15223-8_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free