Next-generation angular distribution models for top-of-atmosphere radiative flux calculation from CERES instruments: Validation

73Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Radiative fluxes at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) instrument are fundamental variables for understanding the Earth's energy balance and how it changes with time. TOA radiative fluxes are derived from the CERES radiance measurements using empirical angular distribution models (ADMs). This paper evaluates the accuracy of CERES TOA fluxes using direct integration and flux consistency tests. Direct integration tests show that the overall bias in regional monthly mean TOA shortwave (SW) flux is less than 0.2 Wm -2 and the RMSE is less than 1.1 Wm -2. The bias and RMSE are very similar between Terra and Aqua. The bias in regional monthly mean TOA LW fluxes is less than 0.5 Wm -2 and the RMSE is less than 0.8 Wm -2 for both Terra and Aqua. The accuracy of the TOA instantaneous flux is assessed by performing tests using fluxes inverted from nadir- and oblique-viewing angles using CERES along-track observations and temporally and spatially matched MODIS observations, and using fluxes inverted from multi-angle MISR observations. The averaged TOA instantaneous SW flux uncertainties from these two tests are about 2.3 % (1.9 Wm -2) over clear ocean, 1.6 % (4.5 Wm -2) over clear land, and 2.0 % (6.0 Wm -2) over clear snow/ice; and are about 3.3 % (9.0 Wm -2), 2.7 % (8.4 Wm -2), and 3.7 % (9.9 Wm -2) over ocean, land, and snow/ice under all-sky conditions. The TOA SW flux uncertainties are generally larger for thin broken clouds than for moderate and thick overcast clouds. The TOA instantaneous daytime LW flux uncertainties derived from the CERES-MODIS test are 0.5 % (1.5 Wm -2), 0.8 % (2.4 Wm -2), and 0.7 % (1.3 Wm -2) over clear ocean, land, and snow/ice; and are about 1.5 % (3.5 Wm -2), 1.0 % (2.9 Wm -2), and 1.1 % (2.1 Wm -2) over ocean, land, and snow/ice under all-sky conditions. The TOA instantaneous nighttime LW flux uncertainties are about 0.5-1 % (< 2.0 Wm -2) for all surface types. Flux uncertainties caused by errors in scene identification are also assessed by using the collocated CALIPSO, CloudSat, CERES and MODIS data product. Errors in scene identification tend to underestimate TOA SW flux by about 0.6 Wm -2 and overestimate TOA daytime (nighttime) LW flux by 0.4 (0.2) Wm -2 when all CERES viewing angles are considered.

References Powered by Scopus

Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES): An Earth Observing System Experiment

1715Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Aerosol properties over bright-reflecting source regions

1086Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global evaluation of the Collection 5 MODIS dark-target aerosol products over land

1060Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Clouds and the Earth'S Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) top-of-atmosphere (TOA) edition-4.0 data product

633Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CERES top-of-atmosphere earth radiation budget climate data record: Accounting for in-orbit changes in instrument calibration

70Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Validation of the CERES edition-4A surface-only flux algorithms

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Su, W., Corbett, J., Eitzen, Z., & Liang, L. (2015). Next-generation angular distribution models for top-of-atmosphere radiative flux calculation from CERES instruments: Validation. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 8(8), 3297–3313. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3297-2015

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

58%

Researcher 9

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 18

72%

Physics and Astronomy 3

12%

Environmental Science 3

12%

Engineering 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free