Emotional intelligence in library response assistance teams: Competencies emerged?

13Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This qualitative study examines the relationship between emotional intelligence competencies and the personal attributes of library disaster response assistance team (DRAT) members. Using appreciative inquiry protocol to conduct interviews at two academic libraries, the study presents findings from emergent thematic coding of interview transcripts, documents, and artifacts as well as through the application of predetermined concept choice mapping of the data. Study findings suggest a strong relationship between emotional intelligence competencies and attributes exhibited by DRAT members as they dealt with the disasters at their respective institutions and may inform library leaders who appoint and provide training for team members.

References Powered by Scopus

Emerging Criteria for Quality in Qualitative and Interpretive Research

852Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Leadership and emotional intelligence: A study of university library directors and their senior management teams

51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Emotional intelligence: Which traits are most prized?

47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Innovation and cross-functional teams: Analysis of innovative initiatives in a Brazilian public organization

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Academic librarians: Their understanding and use of emotional intelligence and happiness

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Do University Libraries in Australia Actively Plan to Protect Special Collections from Disaster?

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilkinson, F. C. (2015). Emotional intelligence in library response assistance teams: Competencies emerged? College and Research Libraries, 76(2), 188–204. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.2.188

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

75%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Researcher 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 10

50%

Computer Science 4

20%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

15%

Psychology 3

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free