Testing for clustering at many ranges inflates family-wise error rate (FWE)

4Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Testing for clustering at multiple ranges within a single dataset is a common practice in spatial epidemiology. It is not documented whether this approach has an impact on the type 1 error rate. Methods: We estimated the family-wise error rate (FWE) for the difference in Ripley's K functions test, when testing at an increasing number of ranges at an alpha-level of 0.05. Case and control locations were generated from a Cox process on a square area the size of the continental US (≈ 3,000,000 mi2). Two thousand Monte Carlo replicates were used to estimate the FWE with 95% confidence intervals when testing for clustering at one range, as well as 10, 50, and 100 equidistant ranges. Results: The estimated FWE and 95% confidence intervals when testing 10, 50, and 100 ranges were 0.22 (0.20-0.24), 0.34 (0.31-0.36), and 0.36 (0.34-0.38), respectively. Conclusions: Testing for clustering at multiple ranges within a single dataset inflated the FWE above the nominal level of 0.05. Investigators should construct simultaneous critical envelopes (available in spatstat package in R), or use a test statistic that integrates the test statistics from each range, as suggested by the creators of the difference in Ripley's K functions test.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Loop, S. S., & McClure, L. A. (2015). Testing for clustering at many ranges inflates family-wise error rate (FWE). International Journal of Health Geographics, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-14-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free