Comparison of 6-Month Outcomes of Survivors of COVID-19 versus Non–COVID-19 Critical Illness

60Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Rationale: The outcomes of survivors of critical illness due to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) compared with non–COVID-19 are yet to be established. Objectives: We aimed to investigate new disability at 6 months in mechanically ventilated patients admitted to Australian ICUs with COVID-19 compared with non–COVID-19. Methods: We included critically ill patients with COVID-19 and non–COVID-19 from two prospective observational studies. Patients were eligible if they were adult (age > 8 yr) and received >24 hours of mechanical ventilation. In addition, patients with COVID-19 were eligible with a positive laboratory PCR test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Measurements and Main Results: Demographic, intervention, and hospital outcome data were obtained from electronic medical records. Survivors were contacted by telephone for functional outcomes with trained outcome assessors using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Between March 6, 2020, and April 21, 2021, 120 critically ill patients with COVID-19, and between August 2017 and January 2019, 199 critically ill patients without COVID-19, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Patients with COVID-19 were older (median [interquartile range], 62 [55–71] vs. 58 [44–69] yr; P = 0.019) with a lower Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (17 [13–20] vs. 19 [15–23]; P = 0.011). Although duration of ventilation was longer in patients with COVID-19 than in those without COVID-19 (12 [5–19] vs. 4.8 [2.3–8.8] d; P, 0.001), 180-day mortality was similar between the groups (39/120 [32.5%] vs. 70/199 [35.2%]; P = 0.715). The incidence of death or new disability at 180 days was similar (58/93 [62.4%] vs. 99/150 [66/0%]; P = 0.583). Conclusions: At 6 months, there was no difference in new disability for patients requiring mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 compared with non–COVID-19.

References Powered by Scopus

6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study

3173Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome

2145Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness

2008Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: diagnosis, outcomes, long-term sequelae, and management

184Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19: understanding and addressing the burden of multisystem manifestations

100Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Long-term (180-Day) Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 in the REMAP-CAP Randomized Clinical Trial

87Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hodgson, C. L., Higgins, A. M., Bailey, M. J., Mather, A. M., Beach, L., Bellomo, R., … Neto, A. S. (2022). Comparison of 6-Month Outcomes of Survivors of COVID-19 versus Non–COVID-19 Critical Illness. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 205(10), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202110-2335OC

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 24

53%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

40%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

4%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 36

77%

Nursing and Health Professions 7

15%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

4%

Immunology and Microbiology 2

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 5

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free