Comment on “Climatic impact of the long-lasting laki eruption: Inapplicability of mass-independent sulfur isotope composition measurements” by Schmidt et al

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Schmidt et al., in “Climatic impact of the long-lasting Laki eruption: Inapplicability of mass-independent sulfur isotope composition measurements,” question the data and the methodology of Lanciki et al. [2012] and disagree with the conclusions by Lanciki et al. regarding the climatic aftermath of the Laki eruption. Here we respond to the issues and questions raised by Schmidt et al. and discuss the disagreements about our conclusions in Lanciki et al. [2012] (hereafter abbreviated as LA2012).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cole-Dai, J., Savarino, J., Thiemens, M. H., & Lanciki, A. (2014). Comment on “Climatic impact of the long-lasting laki eruption: Inapplicability of mass-independent sulfur isotope composition measurements” by Schmidt et al. Journal of Geophysical Research, 119(11), 6629–6635. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD019869

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free