Development and Validation of a Modified Pathologic Nodal Classification System for Cutaneous Melanoma

4Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Importance: Given the evolving patterns of lymph node evaluation for cutaneous melanoma, it is unclear whether the current nodal classification system will continue to accurately reflect prognosis in the modern era. Existing nodal staging for cutaneous melanoma was developed primarily for patients undergoing completion lymph node dissection (CLND) for node-positive disease and does not produce groups with continuously increasing mortality. Objective: To develop and validate a modified nodal classification system for cutaneous melanoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort analysis included 105785 patients with cutaneous melanoma undergoing surgery and nodal evaluation from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2015, in the National Cancer Database. Extent of lymph node dissection was available for patients diagnosed in 2012 and onward. Multivariable models were generated with number of positive lymph nodes modeled using restricted cubic splines. A modified nodal classification system was derived using recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). The proposed lymph node classification system was validated in 85499 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER-18) database. Data were analyzed from April 9, 2020, to May 28, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival. Results: Among the 105 785 patients included in the analysis (62496 men [59.1%]; mean [SD] age, 59.9 [15.5] years), number of positive lymph nodes (hazard ratio [HR] per lymph node for 0 to 2 positive lymph nodes, 2.48 [95% CI, 2.37-2-61; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nguyen, A. T., Luu, M., Nguyen, V. P., Hamid, O., Faries, M. B., Gharavi, N. M., … Zumsteg, Z. S. (2021). Development and Validation of a Modified Pathologic Nodal Classification System for Cutaneous Melanoma. JAMA Surgery, 156(11). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4298

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free