Sour clinical trials: Autonomy and adaptive preferences in experimental medicine

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Whenever possible, life and death decisions should be made autonomously. A decision is made autonomously when an agent calmly reflects over her preferences, which she had some role in developing, and determines that her decision is best for her, given her circumstances. When a medical patient makes a life and death decision autonomously, it is the best decision for her circumstances, as determined by her. If a medical professional pushes a patient to make a life and death decision non-autonomously, it would be severely morally problematic since the patient would not have the chance to make the decision she felt was best, which should be her right since her life is on the line.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rocha, J. (2013). Sour clinical trials: Autonomy and adaptive preferences in experimental medicine. In Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics (Vol. 10, pp. 101–115). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38376-2_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free