Analisis Kesalahan Newman (Newman Error Analysis-Nea): Perbandingan Ketelitian Antara Siswa Yang Menghafal Dan Tidak Menghafal Alqur’an

  • Mukminah M
  • Riana R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Newman (1977) form Australia was defined five specific literacy and numeracy skills as crucial to performance on mathematical word problems: (1) reading error, (2) comprehension error, (3) transformation error, (4) process skills error, and (5) encoding error. The purpose of this study is to comparison Newman Error Analysis (NEA) between students are memorize and not memorize Al-Quran in solving word problem. This research is a qualitative research, and the subject of this research is students in grade 11th of MA in central lombok, with respectively six school in sub-district.. The result of this research is there are differences Newman’s Error Analysis (NEA) Between Students Are Memorize and Not Memorize Al-Quran in Solving Math Word Problems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mukminah, M., & Riana, R. (2020). Analisis Kesalahan Newman (Newman Error Analysis-Nea): Perbandingan Ketelitian Antara Siswa Yang Menghafal Dan Tidak Menghafal Alqur’an. JIKAP PGSD: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Kependidikan, 4(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.26858/jkp.v4i1.12045

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free