Visual arguments can seem to require unique, autonomous evaluative norms, since their content seems irreducible to, and incommensurable with, that of verbal arguments. Yet, assertions of the ineffability of the visual, or of visual-verbal incommensurability, seem to preclude counting putatively irreducible visual content as functioning argumentatively. By distinguishing two notions of content, informational and argumentative, I contend that arguments differing in informational content can have equivalent argumentative content, allowing the same argumentative norms to be rightly applied in their evaluation.
CITATION STYLE
Godden, D. (2017). On the Norms of Visual Argument: A Case for Normative Non-revisionism. Argumentation, 31(2), 395–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-016-9411-9
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.