Preoperative skeletal muscle index vs the controlling nutritional status score: Which is a better objective predictor of long-term survival for gastric cancer patients after radical gastrectomy?

28Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Skeletal muscle index (SMI) and the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score are useful for evaluating nutritional status, which is closely associated with cancer prognosis. This study compared the prognostic value of these indicators in patients with gastric cancer (GC) after radical gastrectomy (RG). We retrospectively enrolled 532 patients between 2010 and 2011. SMI was measured via CT images to determine low SMI. The CONUT score was calculated based on serum albumin, total lymphocyte count, and cholesterol. Patients were grouped according to SMI and the CONUT score based on previous research. Spearman's correlation coefficient, the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression were used. There was no significant correlation between SMI and the CONUT score. Five-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with low SMI were significantly worse than those in patients with high SMI (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zheng, Z. F., Lu, J., Xie, J. W., Wang, J. B., Lin, J. X., Chen, Q. Y., … Li, P. (2018). Preoperative skeletal muscle index vs the controlling nutritional status score: Which is a better objective predictor of long-term survival for gastric cancer patients after radical gastrectomy? Cancer Medicine, 7(8), 3537–3547. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1548

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free