Does the impact of peripheral nerve blocks vary by age and comorbidity subgroups? A nationwide population-based study

1Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction A large body of literature suggests that peripheral nerve blockade (PNB) is associated with improved perioperative outcomes in total hip and knee joint arthroplasty patients. However, it is unclear to what extent this association exists across patient subgroups based on age and health status. Methods Patients who underwent total joint arthroplasty were identified from the Premier Healthcare database (2006–2019). Mixed-effects models were applied to assess the relationship between exposure of interest (PNB use on the day of surgery) and various outcomes (postoperative respiratory complications, acute renal failure, delirium, intensive care unit admission, prolonged length of stay, and high opioid consumption) across multiple subgroups stratified by patient age and pre-existing comorbidities. Results PNB use and outcome association varies based on the patient’s health and age characteristics. For adults and older adults with excellent or fair, there was a decrease in the likelihood of respiratory complication with the use of PNB (OR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.98; OR: 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.95; OR: 0.94, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.99, respectively). Peripheral nerve blocks were also associated with a reduction in the odds of high opioid consumption across all categories except adult patients in poor health. Conclusion PNB use is associated with beneficial effects more commonly observed among patients with a lower comorbidity burden, without a clear pattern of association with patient age.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhong, H., Poeran, J., Cozowicz, C., Athanassoglou, V., Illescas, A., Memtsoudis, S. G., & Liu, J. (2023). Does the impact of peripheral nerve blocks vary by age and comorbidity subgroups? A nationwide population-based study. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 49(4), 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2022-104150

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free