Impact of renal failure on the outcome of dengue viral infection

68Citations
Citations of this article
97Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and objectives: In the 2002 dengue outbreak in Taiwan, some fatal cases had the underlying disease of renal failure (RF). Physicians faced difficulty in diagnosis and treatment of these patients; however, the impacts of RF on the clinical presentations and outcomes of dengue infection have not been reported previously. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: A retrospective review was conducted of medical records, clinical presentations, laboratory findings, and underlying diseases for all cases of dengue infection in a medical center. Characteristics and outcomes of dengue-infected patients with and without RF were compared. Results: From January 2002 through January 2003, 519 dengue-infected patients were enrolled, including 412 patients with classical dengue fever (DF) and 107 patients with dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF)/dengue shock syndrome (DSS). Twelve patients died in this outbreak, and all had DHF/DSS. Twenty-one (4.0%) patients were defined as being in the RF group. The RF group had a higher mortality rate than non-RF group (28.6 versus 1.2%; P < 0.001). The severity of GFR impairment was associated with higher percentages of DHF/DSS (P = 0.029) and mortality (P < 0.001). Differences in symptoms/signs and laboratory abnormalities between DF and DHF/DSS were significant in the non-RF group but not apparent in the RF group. Conclusions: The diagnosis and management of dengue infection among patients with RF must be cautious, because complicated clinical courses with a higher mortality rate were well observed. Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kuo, M. C., Lu, P. L., Chang, J. M., Lin, M. Y., Tsai, J. J., Chen, Y. H., … Hwang, S. J. (2008). Impact of renal failure on the outcome of dengue viral infection. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 3(5), 1350–1356. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.00020108

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free