Whither economic history? Between narratives and quantification

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Macroeconomic analysis is not just a game of equations; it is a narrative of the real. We argue in this article for a re-evaluation of the importance of narratives. Because each financial crisis is a unique event, the narrative is the natural form of analysis. In addition, the effects of economic policies can no longer be analysed independently of the narratives appropriated by economic agents (Schiller, 2017) and policy makers (Friedman and Schwartz, 1963). There is a twofold value in adding the historical dimension. Economic history is instructive by multiplying case studies, i.e. by increasing the variety of policy successes and failures analysed. History also loosens the shackles of our preconceptions, since comparing the past and present calls into question the exceptional nature of what we are living.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Antipa, P., & Bignon, V. (2018). Whither economic history? Between narratives and quantification. Revue de l’OFCE. Presses de Sciences Po. https://doi.org/10.3917/reof.157.0017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free