Participation without Contestation: NGOs' Autonomy and Advocacy in China

5Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

How do non-governmental organizations (NGOs) advocate public policies? What impacts their advocacy strategies? Although scholars have addressed these questions in a democratic context, less is known about NGO advocacy under powerful authoritarian regimes. Using China as a case study, we develop an institutional explanation of NGOs' policy advocacy patterns and explore the impacts of NGO autonomy. Using a unique dataset of registered NGOs in three Chinese provinces, we find that NGOs with more autonomy tend to conduct direct negotiations with the government more actively (more political advocacy). However, these more autonomous NGOs are likely to be more hesitant to mobilize society from the bottom up (less social advocacy). These findings enrich our knowledge of social actors' roles in the policymaking process in China.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Su, Z., Ma, S., & Zhang, C. (2022). Participation without Contestation: NGOs’ Autonomy and Advocacy in China. China Quarterly, 251, 888–912. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741022000510

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free