Initiating Negotiations: The Role of Machiavellianism, Risk Propensity, and Bargaining Power

23Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Initiation is an often-overlooked yet essential stage of the negotiation process. This study examined the effects of two measures of personality-Machiavellianism and risk propensity-and relative bargaining power (as based on multiple situational factors) on three phases of the initiation process-engaging a counterpart, making a request, and optimizing the request. Using a multi-scenario approach, one hundred fifteen participants indicated their initiation preferences for three distinct negotiations. The results of repeated measures ANOVAs indicate that bargaining power influences an individual's decision to initiate negotiations. In addition, those high in Machiavellianism choose to initiate negotiations even when relative bargaining power is low, whereas those high in risk propensity tend to optimize their requests. The implications of these findings for practitioners and future research are discussed. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kapoutsis, I., Volkema, R. J., & Nikolopoulos, A. G. (2013). Initiating Negotiations: The Role of Machiavellianism, Risk Propensity, and Bargaining Power. Group Decision and Negotiation, 22(6), 1081–1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-012-9306-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free