Stabilizing roles of residual structure in the empty heme binding pockets and unfolded states of microsomal and mitochondrial apocytochrome b 5

  • Cowley A
  • Rivera M
  • Benson D
13Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The microsomal (Mc) and mitochondrial (OM) isoforms of mammalian cytochrome b 5 are the products of different genes, which likely arose via duplication of a primordial gene and subsequent functional divergence. Despite sharing essentially identical folds, heme‐polypeptide interactions are stronger in OM b 5 s than in Mc b 5 s due to the presence of two conserved patches of hydrophobic amino acid side chains in the OM heme binding pockets. This is of fundamental interest in terms of understanding heme protein structure–function relationships, because stronger heme–polypeptide interactions in OM b 5 s in comparison to Mc b 5 s may represent a key source of their more negative reduction potentials. Herein we provide evidence that interactions amongst the amino acid side chains contributing to the hydrophobic patches in rat OM (rOM) b 5 persist when heme is removed, rendering the empty heme binding pocket of rOM apo‐b 5 more compact and less conformationally dynamic than that in bovine Mc (bMc) apo‐b 5 . This may contribute to the stronger heme binding by OM apo‐b 5 by reducing the entropic penalty associated with polypeptide folding. We also show that when bMc apo‐b 5 unfolds it adopts a structure that is more compact and contains greater nonrandom secondary structure content than unfolded rOM apo‐b 5 . We propose that a more robust β‐sheet in Mc apo‐b 5 s compensates for the absence of the hydrophobic packing interactions that stabilize the heme binding pocket in OM apo‐b 5 s.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cowley, A. B., Rivera, M., & Benson, D. R. (2004). Stabilizing roles of residual structure in the empty heme binding pockets and unfolded states of microsomal and mitochondrial apocytochrome b 5. Protein Science, 13(9), 2316–2329. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.04817704

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free