Prognostic impact of number of examined lymph nodes on survival of patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND The prognosis of patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors (ANETs) is related to lymph node (LN) metastasis and other factors. However, it is unclear how the number of examined LNs (ELNs) impact on survival. AIM To determine the factors affecting the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with ANET and to evaluate the impact of the number of ELNs on survival. METHODS A total of 4583 ANET patients were analyzed in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Univariate survival analysis was used to identify factors related to survival and the optimal number of ELNs and lymph node ratio (LNR) were determined by the Kaplan–Meier method. The survival difference was determined by CSS. RESULTS Except for sex, the other factors, such as age, year, race, grade, histological type, stage, tumor size, ELNs, LNR, and surgery type, were associated with prognosis. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year CSS rates of ANET patients were 91.2%, 87.5, and 81.7%, respectively (median follow-up period of 31 mo and range of 0-499 mo). There was no survival difference between the two surgery types, namely, local resection and colectomy or greater, in both stratifications of tumor size ≥ 2 cm (P = 0.523) and < 2 cm (P = 0.068). In contrast to patients with a tumor size < 2 cm, those with a tumor size ≥ 2 cm were more likely to have LN metastasis (χ2 = 378.16, P < 0.001). The optimal number of ELNs was more than 11, 7, and 18 for all patients, nodenegative patients, and node-positive patients, respectively. CSS rates of patients with a larger number of ELNs were significantly improved (≤ 10 vs ≥ 11, χ2 = 20.303, P < 0.001; ≤ 6 vs ≥ 7, χ2 = 11.569, P < 0.001; ≤ 17 vs ≥ 18, χ2 = 21.990, P < 0.001; respectively). ANET patients with an LNR value ≤ 0.16 were more likely to have better survival than those with values of 0.17-0.48 (χ2 = 48.243, P < 0.001) and 0.49-1 (χ2 = 168.485, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION ANET ≥ 2 cm are more likely to develop LN metastasis. At least 11 ELNs are required to better evaluate the prognosis. For patients with positive LN metastasis, 18 or more LNs need to be detected and lower LNR values (LNR ≤ 0.16) indicate a better survival prognosis

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Du, R., & Xiao, J. W. (2022). Prognostic impact of number of examined lymph nodes on survival of patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 10(30), 10906–10920. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i30.10906

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free