Interaction between genetic variations in DNA repair genes and plasma folate on breast cancer risk

38Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Folate status has been inversely associated with breast cancer risk. Because folate deficiency can cause DNA damage, such as uracil misincorporation, single strand breaks, and double strand breaks, genetic polymorphisms in base excision repair and double strand break repair genes may lead to variation in DNA repair proficiency and modify the effect of folate on breast cancer risk. We prospectively investigated the a priori hypothesized interaction between plasma folate levels and five nonsynonymous polymorphisms in the XRCC1, XRCC2, and XRCC3 genes on breast cancer risk in a nested case-control study within the Nurses' Health Study (712 case-control pairs). Suggestive evidence of interaction was seen for two of these polymorphisms. Compared with the reference group of non-carriers in the lowest quartile of plasma folate, the reduction in risk (66%) was statistically significant among XRCC1 194Trp carriers in the highest quartile (multivariate odds ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.72). The inverse association between XRCC1 194Trp and breast cancer risk was attenuated by lower plasma folate status. The inverse association between plasma folate level and breast cancer risk was stronger among 194Trp carriers (P, trend = 0.01) than noncarriers (P, trend = 0.09). We also observed that the positive association between the XRCC2 188His allele and breast cancer risk was only significant in women in the lowest plasma folate quartile (carriers versus non-carriers; multivariate odds ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-3.97), and this excess risk was abolished among those with higher plasma folate levels. Moreover, the inverse association between plasma folate level and breast cancer risk was stronger among XRCC2 188His carriers (P, trend = 0.004) than non-carriers (P, trend = 0.09). Although none of the statistical tests for interaction was significant, these data give some support for the hypothesis that genetic variations in DNA repair genes may modify the relation between plasma folate level and breast cancer risk.

References Powered by Scopus

Medical Sciences Folate deficiency causes uracil misincorporation into human DNA and chromosome breakage: Implications for cancer and neuronal damage

1244Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reconstitution of DNA base excision-repair with purified human proteins: Interaction between DNA polymerase β and the XRCC1 protein

709Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

From BRCA1 to RAP1: A widespread BRCT module closely associated with DNA repair

498Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The RAD51 gene family, genetic instability and cancer

297Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

XRCC1 polymorphisms and cancer risk: A meta-analysis of 38 case-control studies

204Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and epithelial ovarian cancer risk

131Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Han, J., Hankinson, S. E., Zhang, S. M., De Vivo, I., & Hunter, D. J. (2004). Interaction between genetic variations in DNA repair genes and plasma folate on breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, 13(4), 520–524. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.520.13.4

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

40%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

27%

Researcher 4

27%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

35%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 6

35%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

24%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free