Medical humanities: A vision and some cautionary notes

45Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article aims to engender discussion about the nature and future of medical humanities. First, a normative personal vision of medical humanities as an inclusive movement is outlined. Some of the problems that may emerge if medical humanities conceives itself too narrowly are then discussed. The case of the rise of the medical ethics movement is used to show what can happen to a movement that restricts itself too quickly and then the stages of the "death course of a discipline" are described and assayed. The article concludes with a plea for medical humanities to remain a "broad church", exploratory, pluralistic movement rather than aiming to become a paramedical academic discipline.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Critical medical humanities: Embracing entanglement, taking risks

142Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Art rounds: Teaching interprofessional students visual thinking strategies at one school

102Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rethinking research in the medical humanities: A scoping review and narrative synthesis of quantitative outcome studies

63Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pattison, S. (2003). Medical humanities: A vision and some cautionary notes. Medical Humanities, 29(1), 33–36. https://doi.org/10.1136/mh.29.1.33

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

29%

Researcher 4

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

21%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

46%

Arts and Humanities 4

31%

Social Sciences 2

15%

Design 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free