The overcoming of the antinomy between realism and constructivism in Luhmann and Bhaskar: Towards a paradoxical foundation of scientific knowledge

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper inquires into the epistemological positions assumed by Luhmann and Bhaskar, looking for a comparison among their conceptions of the unit of analysis and the scientific knowledge. Our hypothesis suggests that both authors convergently conceive of the distinction between realism and constructivism in paradoxical terms, thus overcoming its dualistic interpretation.

References Powered by Scopus

Can social systems be autopoietic? Assessing Luhmann's social theory

118Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Can social systems be autopoietic? Bhaskar's and giddens' social theories

70Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Luhmann and emergentism: Competing paradigms for social systems theory?

57Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Operative Constructivism of Luhmann and his Reflection on Scientific Knowledge

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ontologic and epistemologic contributions of Luhmann's theory of the observer

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

In pursuit of ontology in Niklas Luhmann’s de-ontologization project

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ocampo, S. P. (2019). The overcoming of the antinomy between realism and constructivism in Luhmann and Bhaskar: Towards a paradoxical foundation of scientific knowledge. Revista Internacional de Sociologia, 77(1). https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2019.77.1.17.159

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘2400.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 1

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0