Reproductive Tourism: Through the Anthropological "reproscope"

41Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This review analyzes the emerging literature on reproductive tourism through a metaphorical "reproscope," focusing largely on cross-border egg donation and surrogacy as the prime areas of contemporary anthropological investigation. While acknowledging that reproductive travel is not new, this article recognizes that there has been an increased volume of such travel over the past couple of decades. It provides an overview of the major areas of anthropological investigation into these transnational phenomena, globalization, stratification, exploitation, race, nationalism, religion, biopower, and bioethics. I propose that these areas of investigation may provide key indications about the preoccupations of anthropology today. Namely, what kind of discipline does anthropology imagine itself to be?

References Powered by Scopus

Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems

591Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Commercial surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a perfect mother-worker

277Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Theorizing the Bioeconomy: Biovalue, Biocapital, Bioeconomics or . . . What?

272Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

On Reproductive Work in Spain: Transnational Adoption, Egg Donation, Surrogacy

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Globalised quests for assisted conception: Reproductive travel for infertility and involuntary childlessness

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multiple mobilities in Mexico’s fertility industry

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nahman, M. R. (2016, October 21). Reproductive Tourism: Through the Anthropological “reproscope.” Annual Review of Anthropology. Annual Reviews Inc. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030459

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 33

85%

Researcher 4

10%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 28

80%

Arts and Humanities 3

9%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

6%

Psychology 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0