Guided bone regeneration with subperiosteal implants of PTFE and hydroxyapatite physical barriers in rats.

15Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Regeneration of periodontal and alveolar ridge defects utilizing membranes is a well-established procedure in reconstructive surgery. Biomaterial characteristics and membrane design employed in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) techniques play an important role in good results. The purpose of this histologic experimental study in rats was to compare the use of two physical barriers in the osteopromotion by using GTR principles in bone defects created in tibias. Fifteen animals divided into 3 groups were used: group I (non-porous polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) barrier), group II (coral hydroxyapatite (HA) blocks), and group III (defects that received no physical barrier). Histological examination showed varied amounts of newly formed bone beneath both types of barriers. The non-porous PTFE barrier showed better results than the HA group. The results of this study suggest that bone regeneration can be successfully enhanced by a submerged membrane technique.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Macedo, N. L., de Macedo, L. G. S., Matuda, F. de S., Ouchi, S. M., Monteiro, A. S. F., & Carvalho, Y. R. (2003). Guided bone regeneration with subperiosteal implants of PTFE and hydroxyapatite physical barriers in rats. Brazilian Dental Journal, 14(2), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-64402003000200009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free