Tinnitus Outcomes Assessment

75Citations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Over the past two decades, recognition has grown that measures for evaluating treatment outcomes must be designed specifically to have high responsiveness. With that in mind, four major types of tinnitus measures are reviewed, including psychoacoustic measures, self-report questionnaires concerning functional effects of tinnitus, various rating scales, and global outcome measures. Nine commonly used tinnitus questionnaires, developed in the period 1980-2000, are reviewed. Because of many similarities between tinnitus and pain, comparisons between pain and tinnitus measures are discussed, and recommendations that have been made for developing a core set of measures to evaluate treatment-related changes in pain are presented as providing a fruitful path for developing a core set of measures for tinnitus. Finally, the importance of having both immediately obtainable outcome measures (psychoacoustic, rating scales, or single global measures) and longer term measures (questionnaires covering the negative effects of tinnitus) is emphasized for further work in tinnitus outcomes assessment. © 2008, SAGE Publications. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meikle, M. B., Stewart, B. J., Griest, S. E., & Henry, J. A. (2008). Tinnitus Outcomes Assessment. Trends in Amplification, 12(3), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1084713808319943

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free