Closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction The closed testing principle provides strong control of the type I error probabilities of tests of a set of hypotheses that are closed under intersection such that a given hypothesis H can only be tested and rejected at level α if all intersection hypotheses containing that hypothesis are also tested and rejected at level α. For the higher order hypotheses, multivariate tests (> 1df) are generally employed. However, such tests are directed to an omnibus alternative hypothesis of a difference in any direction for any component that may be less meaningful than a test directed against a restricted alternative hypothesis of interest. Methods Herein we describe applications of this principle using an α-level test of a surrogate hypothesis ~H such that the type I error probability is preserved if H ) ~H such that rejection of ~H implies rejection of H. Applications include the analysis of multiple event times in a Wei- Lachin test against a one-directional alternative, a test of the treatment group difference in the means of K repeated measures using a 1 df test of the difference in the longitudinal LSMEANS, and analyses within subgroups when a test of treatment by subgroup interaction is significant. In such cases the successive higher order surrogate tests can be aimed at detecting parameter values that fall within a more desirable restricted subspace of the global alternative hypothesis parameter space. Conclusion Closed testing using α-level tests of surrogate hypotheses will protect the type I error probability and detect specific alternatives of interest, as opposed to the global alternative hypothesis of any difference in any direction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lachin, J. M., Bebu, I., Larsen, M. D., & Younes, N. (2019). Closed testing using surrogate hypotheses with restricted alternatives. PLoS ONE, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219520

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free