When technology collaborates: Politics and the aesthetic of “we” human-and-technology

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This essay proposes “We” human-and-technology as the new human identity performed by the collaborative action of human and technology. Its aim is to open a new way for intersections of art, technology and humanities, through the political and aesthetic intimacy of human and technology in the collaborative action based interdependent perspective. “We” human-and-technology emphasizes the process of when the collaborative action of human and technology is performed. It shows that technology as power and knowledge relations intervenes on the knowledge system, in particular, the binary frame reinforcing a mutual degradation between human and technology, thought and action. In the collaboration of “We” human-and-technology, technology’s interventions focuses on two ideas: Enframing and the fetish. The former presents that the binary frame is an inversion. It uses an instrument for ideology subordinating both humans and technology into the instrument. The latter reveals that the binary frame of “Us” versus “Them” governs our senses through the fetish as blinded practices and beliefs. It implies that how the instrumental understanding of technology conducts the fetishism distorting relations between human and technology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cho, H., Luke, T. W., & Yoon, J. (2015). When technology collaborates: Politics and the aesthetic of “we” human-and-technology. In Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, LNICST (Vol. 145, pp. 54–60). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18836-2_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free