Background: Rumination increases vulnerability to depression, exacerbates and perpetuates negative moods. This study was aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the 10-item Ruminative Response Scale (RRS-10) in a large undergraduate sample. Methods: A sample of 5,236 university students finished the RRS and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was performed to examine the two-factor structure and the measurement equivalence of the RRS-10 across gender. The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, correlations among RRS, RRS-10 and CES-D were also explored. In addition, gender difference on rumination and the relationship between rumination and depression were further investigated. Results: The two-factor model of RRS-10 fit the data reasonably and had acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability in Chinese undergraduates sample. And the measurement equivalence of the RRS-10 was acceptable across gender in Chinese university students. Findings in respect of latent means and manifest means revealed non-significant gender difference in RRS-10. Besides, participants with high-level rumination had more depressive symptoms than those with low-level rumination. Conclusions: The Chinese version of the RRS-10 showed good psychometric properties and was measurement invariant across gender in undergraduates.
CITATION STYLE
Lei, X., Zhong, M., Liu, Y., Xi, C., Ling, Y., Zhu, X., … Yi, J. (2017). Psychometric properties of the 10-item ruminative response scale in Chinese university students. BMC Psychiatry, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1318-y
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.