Eve and the serpent: A rational choice to err

10Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In dealing with inexplicable disaster, like the untimely death of a child in a hospital, we increasingly turn to the justice system for accountability and retribution. While seemingly sensible, criminalizing human error has a range of negative consequences. But it does offer "good" narratives of failure as the result of human fault-even at the cost of guilt. Such narratives allow us to pinpoint a cause: people made a rational choice to err and should be punished. This allows us to imagine ourselves in control over random, meaningless events. This paper traces Judeo-Christian roots of such regulative ideals in Western moral thinking, by examining the Genesis account of Eve and the Serpent, and St. Augustine's interpretation of it. © 2007 Blanton-Peale Institute.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dekker, S. W. A. (2007). Eve and the serpent: A rational choice to err. Journal of Religion and Health, 46(4), 571–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-007-9118-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free