This study addresses the conditions for the participation in protest activities. Starting from social psychological value expectancy theory and the theory of collective action, we study the effects of political discontent, perceived political influence (efficacy), norms to participate, identity, and membership in protest encouraging networks (“social incentives”) on protest. This study challenges the common assumption that these factors have additive effects only and provides a detailed analysis of interaction effects. Another contribution is the theoretical derivation of interaction effects. Our empirical analyses refer to the protests in Leipzig (East Germany) in 1989 under communist rule. Two-way interactions are found between the following pairs of variables: discontent, influence, and norms. “Identity” (i.e., identification with West Germany) only interacts with discontent. Furthermore, identification is a surrogate for discontent: If identification is strong, discontent no longer influences protest. If identification is weak, increasing discontent raises protest.
CITATION STYLE
Kittel, B., & Opp, K. D. (2019). Dissecting the Conditions of Political Protest. An Exploration of Interaction Effects in the Explanation of Political Protest. Sociological Inquiry, 89(1), 67–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12233
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.