Sensitive commercial NASBA assay for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus in clinical specimen

18Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the usability of three diagnostic procedures for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus in clinical samples. Therefore, the FDA cleared CE marked NOW® RSV ELISA, the NucliSENS® EasyQ RSV A+B NASBA, and a literature based inhouse RT-PCR protocol were compared for their relative sensitivities. Thereby, NASBA turned out to be the most sensitive method with a total number of 80 RSV positive samples out of a cohort of 251 nasopharyngeal washings from patients suffering from clinical symptoms, followed by the inhouse RT-PCR (62/251) and ELISA (52/251). Thus, NASBA may serve as a rapid and highly sensitive alternative for RSV diagnostics. © 2007 Tillmann et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tillmann, R. L., Simon, A., Müller, A., & Schildgen, O. (2007). Sensitive commercial NASBA assay for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus in clinical specimen. PLoS ONE, 2(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001357

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free