The present article presents and discusses the recent controversy about the possibility and meaning of relating the game theoretic Nash program to mechanism theory. The non-cooperative foundation of the Nash bargaining solution is used as an example to shed light on the formal relation between traditional non-cooperative support of cooperative solutions and mechanism theoretic implementation of social choice rules. The technical possibility of regarding the Nash program as a part of mechanism theory is taken as a starting point for discussing the meaning of implementation , "good" mechanisms and extensions in the spirit of Hurwicz's (1994) "genuine" implementation.
CITATION STYLE
Trockel, W. (2003). Can and Should the Nash Program Be Looked at as a Part of Mechanism Theory? In Advances in Economic Design (pp. 153–174). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05611-0_9
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.