Politicising the Epokhé: Bernard Stiegler and the Politics of Epochal Suspension

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

For Husserl, the phenomenological epoché is primarily methodological, allowing access to the structures of transcendental consciousness by way of suspending worldly influence. This chapter will demonstrate how this methodological principle is rethought as political in the work of Bernard Stiegler. For Stiegler the epokhé is both the suspension of existing social systems, and a moment of critical redoubling, where the source of disruption is integrated into a new ‘epoch’. In particular it will be shown how Stiegler develops this double understanding of the epokhé through his reading of retentionality as found in the lectures On the Consciousness of Internal Time to develop an understanding of the epochal framing of temporality by technics. By drawing connections between this version of retentionality and the pharmacological character of technics, as simultaneously poisonous and curative, the political stakes of the epokhé lie in the need to fight the poisonous aspects of epochal suspension.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Turner, B. (2020). Politicising the Epokhé: Bernard Stiegler and the Politics of Epochal Suspension. In Contributions To Phenomenology (Vol. 108, pp. 341–354). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29357-4_19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free