Comparison of propofol with enflurane during hypotensive anaesthesia for middle ear surgery

12Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Forty patients undergoing middle ear surgery were allocated randomly to receive propofol induction and maintenance, or thiopentone induction and enflurane maintenance for anaesthesia. Both groups also received fentanyl, alcuronium, nitrous oxide and oxygen. If this did not reduce systolic arterial pressure to 70 mm Hg, labetalol, glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), or both, was administered. Fifteen control patients had enflurane anaesthesia without hypotension. Pre- and postoperative psychometric tests were performed in all groups. The propofol group received significantly more labetalol (P=0.0 14) and GTN (P=0.004) than the enfiurane group. There was a greater increase in reaction times after operation in the study groups (P<0.05) compared with controls. There was no difference between the propofol and enfiurane groups in control of arterial pressure, recovery from anaes thesia or psychometric testing. (Br. J. Anaesth. 1993; 71: 895-897) © 1993 British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bembridge, J. L., Moss, E., Grummitt, R. M., & Noble, J. (1993). Comparison of propofol with enflurane during hypotensive anaesthesia for middle ear surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 71(6), 895–897. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/71.6.895

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free