Incidence and clinical importance of lupus anticoagulant in children with recurrent upper respiratory tract infection

5Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: This study aims to understand the incidence and presence of lupus anticoagulant (LA) in children with recurrent upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). Methods: One hundred and sixty-five patients who were admitted to Departments of Pediatrics and Otolaryngology at Ege University Faculty of Medicine during the last 2 years and 120 age-matched healthy children as a control group were enrolled in the study. Results: The presence of LA in serum was positive in 8 (4.8%) cases in the patient group while only 2 (1.6%) cases in the healthy control group (P =.03). Mean age of patients with LA positive was significantly lower than those of negative cases (P =.02). Of the patients, 92 (55.8%) had adenoid hypertrophy. The annual frequency of URTI did not differ significantly between the LA patients and the LA-negative patients (7.5/year and 6.9/year, respectively). None of the patients with LA positive had adenoid hypertrophy (P =.009). Activated partial thromboplastin time was prolonged in 6 (3.6%) of 165 patients. Of these 6 patients, 2 were also LA positive. The presence of LA disappeared in all the 8 patients 2 months after the diagnosis. Lupus anticoagulant was found negative in all patients at the end of the second month. Conclusion: We found that the ratio of the presence of LA is higher in children with recurrent URTI than healthy children. However, the presence of LA does not lead to bleeding and/or thrombosis, and it disappears in a short period of time. © The Author(s) 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peker, E., Kavakli, K., Balkan, C., Karapinar, D., & Aydemir, B. (2011). Incidence and clinical importance of lupus anticoagulant in children with recurrent upper respiratory tract infection. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 17(2), 220–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076029609351292

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free