The impact of latitude on the prevalence of seasonal depression

54Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: This study sought to determine whether the prevalence of the seasonal subtype of major depression (SAD) in the community varied as a function of latitude. Methods: Random telephone numbers were generated across 8 degrees of latitude (41.5°N to 49.5°N) for the province of Ontario. Eight strata of 1 degree each were sampled equally throughout a 12-month period. Using a validated and structured diagnostic interview, we interviewed by telephone respondents over 20 years of age who had lived in the region for 3 years or more. We evaluated patterns of symptom change across seasons to establish a diagnosis of SAD according to DSM-IV criteria. Results: Of the 2078 households that were assessed for eligibility, 1605 (77%) completed the interview. The crude prevalence of lifetime SAD was 2.6% (95% CI, 1.9 to 3.5). There was no impact of latitude on prevalence of either major depression or the seasonal subtype across the 8 strata, although the global measure of the severity of seasonal change in mood was significantly negatively correlated with latitude. Conclusions: SAD is a common subtype of major depression in Ontario, but there is no evidence to support an increase in prevalence with increasing latitude.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Levitt, A. J., & Boyle, M. H. (2002). The impact of latitude on the prevalence of seasonal depression. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 47(4), 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370204700407

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free