America and the Trade Regime: What Went Wrong?

20Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The era of American leadership in the multilateral trading regime has ended. This paper argues that this current antipathy to trade is unsurprising: support for US leadership of the regime has always rested on a precarious balance among domestic interests. To overcome a historic bias in favor of home market production, American leaders created incentives for exporters to organize while creating roadblocks for import-competing firms and their employees. The dominance of the exporters' voice had a significant influence on the policies the US pursued in the design and execution of the global trade regime. Most importantly, the absence of labor's voice undermined the prospect for embedded liberalism and instead resulted in an anemic system of adjustment for job loss at home and limited support for worker interests within the regime. While policymakers' decision to shift power away from potential veto groups may have been necessary for US leadership of the Liberal International Order, this institutional design undermined a robust response to the economic dislocation thought to be a result of globalization. The result was a fracturing of the coalition in support of American leadership in the GATT/WTO regime.

References Powered by Scopus

International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar Economic Order

2624Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An economic theory of GATT

566Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Policy uncertainty, trade, and welfare: Theory and evidence for China and the United States

396Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Challenges to the Liberal Order: Reflections on International Organization

231Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Contestations of the Liberal International Order: From Liberal Multilateralism to Postnational Liberalism

140Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Asset Revaluation and the Existential Politics of Climate Change

124Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goldstein, J., & Gulotty, R. (2021). America and the Trade Regime: What Went Wrong? In International Organization (Vol. 75, pp. 524–557). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081832000065X

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘2406121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

63%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

17%

Researcher 4

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 24

77%

Business, Management and Accounting 4

13%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

6%

Computer Science 1

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 5

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0