ChatGPT in forensic sciences: a new Pandora’s box with advantages and challenges to pay attention

5Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

ChatGPT is a variant of the generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) language model that uses large amounts of text-based training data and a transformer architecture to generate human-like text adjusted to the received prompts. ChatGPT presents several advantages in forensic sciences, namely, constituting a virtual assistant to aid lawyers, judges, and victims in managing and interpreting forensic expert data. But what would happen if ChatGPT began to be used to produce forensic expertise reports? Despite its potential applications, the use of ChatGPT and other Large Language Models and artificial intelligence tools in forensic writing also poses ethical and legal concerns, which are discussed in this perspective together with some expected future perspectives.

References Powered by Scopus

ChatGPT: five priorities for research

1046Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Benefits, Limits, and Risks of GPT-4 as an AI Chatbot for Medicine.

829Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ChatGPT in medicine: an overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations

616Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Remote Neuropsychological Assessment: Forensics, Research, and Ethics

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Beyond Pandora's box: vast potential with significant challenges

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Towards a joint semantic analysis in mobile forensics environments

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dinis-Oliveira, R. J., & Azevedo, R. M. S. (2023, December 1). ChatGPT in forensic sciences: a new Pandora’s box with advantages and challenges to pay attention. Forensic Sciences Research. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owad039

Readers over time

‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

53%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

13%

Researcher 2

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 8

53%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

20%

Computer Science 2

13%

Psychology 2

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0