Synoptic reporting increases quality of upper gastrointestinal cancer pathology reports

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Traditionally, surgical pathology reports are narrative. These report types are prone to error and missing data; therefore, structured standardized reporting was introduced. However, the effect of synoptic reporting on the completeness of esophageal and gastric carcinoma pathology reports is not yet established. Materials and methods: A population-based retrospective nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands was conducted over a period of 2012–2016, utilizing the Netherlands Cancer Registry for patient data and the nationwide network and registry of histology for pathology data. Results: In total, 1148 narrative and 1311 synoptic pathology reports were included. Completeness was achieved in 56.4% of the narrative reports versus 97.0% of the synoptic reports (p < 0.01). Out of 21 standard items, 15 were significantly more frequently reported in synoptic reports. Conclusion: Synoptic reporting improves surgical pathology reporting quality and should be implemented in standard patient care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baranov, N. S., Nagtegaal, I. D., van Grieken, N. C. T., Verhoeven, R. H. A., Voorham, Q. J. M., Rosman, C., & van der Post, R. S. (2019). Synoptic reporting increases quality of upper gastrointestinal cancer pathology reports. Virchows Archiv, 475(2), 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-019-02586-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free