Performativity and the ideological construction of the self. The age of narcissism and (possibly) beyond

1Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Since Austin and Searle, performatives are taken to be crucial for the construction of social reality. More recently, performatives have been proposed to be essential for the construction of personal identities, too. I intend to analyze the postmodern assumption according to which this identity construction is in the power of individuals, an assumption which presupposes a view of performatives as endowed with unconstrained power – that is, with a power that is not subject to objective constraints. I will consider some reasons to reject this view. The first is rooted in Judith Butler’s idea that – since normative approaches to political correctness undesirably reduce freedom of speech in the name of equality – we should seriously consider how offensive performatives may fail, due to objective constraints on their felicity. A second reason to reject the postmodern view of performatives lies in the consideration of narcissism as an individual and political issue. Narcissism in the political sphere can be described as a transformation of the “passion for equality” (for individual rights) in an individualistic appetite, deaf to everything else, and especially to social constraints and responsibilities. A different – less narcissistic and more social – model of the self is provided.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mazzone, M. (2020). Performativity and the ideological construction of the self. The age of narcissism and (possibly) beyond. In Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 115–131). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22090-7_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free