Bayesian inference on quasi-sparse count data

13Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is growing interest in analysing high-dimensional count data, which often exhibit quasi-sparsity corresponding to an overabundance of zeros and small nonzero counts. Existing methods for analysing multivariate count data via Poisson or negative binomial log-linear hierarchical models with zero-inflation cannot flexibly adapt to quasi-sparse settings. We develop a new class of continuous local-global shrinkage priors tailored to quasi-sparse counts. Theoretical properties are assessed, including flexible posterior concentration and stronger control of false discoveries in multiple testing. Simulation studies demonstrate excellent small-sample properties relative to competing methods. We use the method to detect rare mutational hotspots in exome sequencing data and to identify North American cities most impacted by terrorism.

References Powered by Scopus

Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage

7588Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

PlK3CA is implicated as an oncogene in ovarian cancer

1024Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Are rare variants responsible for susceptibility to complex diseases?

940Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Lasso meets horseshoe: A survey

94Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Horseshoe Regularisation for Machine Learning in Complex and Deep Models<sup>1</sup>

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On Global-Local Shrinkage Priors for Count Data*

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Datta, J., & Dunson, D. B. (2016). Bayesian inference on quasi-sparse count data. Biometrika, 103(4), 971–983. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asw053

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

42%

Researcher 7

37%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Mathematics 7

54%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

15%

Social Sciences 2

15%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0